this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2025
53 points (100.0% liked)

news

24117 readers
803 users here now

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today/ . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] whatdoiputhere12@hexbear.net 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

what’s the chances of them succeeding, I’m too pessimistic and can actually see them winning

I apologise to any edgy atheist, you were right

[–] MolotovHalfEmpty@hexbear.net 4 points 2 days ago

Not high, unless they manage to succeed in arguing it on a technicality about the planning and consultancy process. But while they're saying that's the issue legally, they're also very publicly shouting about woke and the devil.

This group has been doing some version of this for a couple of decades and they nearly always lose their court cases. They claim it doesn't matter because the point is that Christian voices need to be heard etc. But that's not why they really do it. They bring these cases for two reasons:

  1. to recruit & build further connections (already worryingly extensive) political and general far right connections - which they've historically been good at
  2. to waste an enormous amount of time and money for institutions they deem as being too liberal, too weak, and not fascist enough - councils, schools, charities etc