this post was submitted on 18 Jun 2025
42 points (87.5% liked)

Fuck Cars

12186 readers
1078 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It might be more effective for the sign to read "4 points + $280 fine" instead of "80km/h" when you're in a 40km/h zone, no?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] pdqcp@lemmy.dbzer0.com 29 points 15 hours ago (5 children)

You need to design your streets appropriately and the speed limit will be followed. If you design stroads like a race track, people will speed on it like a race track

If your streets are narrower, has curves, chicanes and trees, it naturally forces drivers to reduce speed without needing speed bumps / radars / giant speed signs (the faster you go, bigger signage is required)

[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 6 points 15 hours ago (4 children)

I absolutely know what should be done, but it's extremely difficult to convince planners and decision makers to do it.

Hell, I was told by a city planner that the only way they could put painted lines on some bike routes was if they kept on-street parking (NIMBYs did not want safe roads).

So, now have bike routes with painted "bike lanes", but people just use it as a parking lane, making it more dangerous for cyclists... maddening, and unnecessarily frustrating.

And in other areas, we have bollards to slow down traffic, but guess what? Assholes park in a way that makes it dangerous for cyclists!

Like this guy:

Or this guy:

[–] huppakee@feddit.nl 3 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Not really sure how to say this in english, but this case i'd say the problem in not only at the front-side (bad design) but also on the back-side (enforcing the rules). Rules that aren't enforced are merely suggestions.

[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

A lack of enforcement is very much a problem around here.

People speed, illegally park, don't stop when they should, turn when they shouldn't. All because they can get away with it.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

That's a strong argument for measures that make it more dififcult to drive unsafely.

For example, if a vehicle exceeds a safe speed (plus a reasonable margin for error), a trapdoor opens in the road and they and their car fall into a deep hole.

I'm inventive and have more suggestions, many inspired by ACME products in Road Runner cartoons.

[–] huppakee@feddit.nl 1 points 20 minutes ago

Keep sharing them, cause I like the trapdoor solution a lot more than a complex road sign ;)

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)