this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2025
24 points (100.0% liked)
chat
8431 readers
215 users here now
Chat is a text only community for casual conversation, please keep shitposting to the absolute minimum. This is intended to be a separate space from c/chapotraphouse or the daily megathread. Chat does this by being a long-form community where topics will remain from day to day unlike the megathread, and it is distinct from c/chapotraphouse in that we ask you to engage in this community in a genuine way. Please keep shitposting, bits, and irony to a minimum.
As with all communities posts need to abide by the code of conduct, additionally moderators will remove any posts or comments deemed to be inappropriate.
Thank you and happy chatting!
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
The site is steigan.no by the way, the about page talks about how the site is "dedicated to critical journalism covering imperialism, war, oppression, exploitation, and threats to the environment, and investigations into capitalist system and its alternatives" (paraphrase) — which together with the clearly leftist aesthetics of the site's design made me think "oh, I guess this is a leftist site?"
But even in the article I was translating, which was about a proposed land seizure in connection with the Ørland airfield, there were a few points in the article where I was thinking "this feels petty bourgeois..." — like how the article was overly sympathetic to farmers and landowners, or how the article lamented the "cost to taxpayers" and things like that. So those were the things that made me raise an eyebrow, especially in the current political climate with the Peace & Justice Party's big reveal about their biggest donor.
I should probably read Lenin's On Petty Bourgeois Revolutionism. I'm reckoning it's probably relevant.
Who?
The Peace & Justice Party's biggest donor is Atle Berge, a billionaire in NOK (i.e. several-hundred-millionaire in USD) with strong business interests in Russia. So I'm just saying that, regardless of what the proletarian interests may be with regard to Russia and NATO, that really most of the opposition to NATO militarism in Norway right now is led by the section of the local bourgeoisie for whom the militarism particularly hurts their bottom line.