this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2025
108 points (63.2% liked)
Memes
51210 readers
1294 users here now
Rules:
- Be civil and nice.
- Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.
founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
"I'm a free thinker who does their own research!"
Meanwhile, the worlder preferred "bastions of journalism":
I am sorry but since when is German left leaning public broadcast the same as fox news?! I understand that sometimes some topics are generally over- or underreported, but putting these next to each other is nonsensical.
Or, as we call it when it's a non-white country: "State propaganda outlet"
Funny that you tie that to the skin color of the people. Most people including me make the distinction based on the following criteria:
In the case of Germany, all of these are not true. In the case of authoritarian regimes, they are. That is the key difference.
So, a bunch of vague, unquantifiable, vibes based criteria, that, in practice, always end up meaning:
Germany just lies about its media
The government obviously has some influence, that is undeniable. But it's limited and saying that they don't criticize the government is just wrong. You can watch many channels on YouTube. You can look at it yourself. They do that and it is undeniable too. Also, the government is prohibited by law to decide the founding. They have minimal influence on the total budget, but they can't decide who gets how much.
How limited? As limited as they themselves claim?
Who do you think funds the high-budget Kurzgesagt and PragerU videos? Who do you think controls YouTube’s recommendation algorithms, search algorithms, and censorship?
Please look into cultivating real media literacy, not the dumbed-down version they teach in high school.