this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2025
172 points (96.2% liked)

Linux

56072 readers
448 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Mihies@programming.dev 3 points 3 days ago (16 children)

The docker is not bare metal though.

[–] utopiah@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 days ago (14 children)

Does it matter if the overhead is practically irrelevant?

[–] trevor@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 3 days ago (11 children)

The biggest downside to containers vs. Nix for me is that Nix can produce binaries for Linux and macOS, whereas docker only helps with Linux unless you can perform literal magic to cross-compile your project on Linux for macOS.

Containers also don't give you reproducible environments, and Nix does.

That said, Nix documentation is ass, so I usually end up going with containers because they require far less suffering to get working because writing a containerfile is much easier than guessing how to hobble together a Nix flake with a mostly undocumented language.

[–] utopiah@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Feels very arbitrary. Why would I care about say MacOS versus FreeBSD or say NeXTSTEP (just to be provocative)?

Anyway I'm being pulled away from the actual argument, the "bare metal" argument is about performances, isn't it?

[–] iopq@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Yes, the systems people actually use vs every system that exists. Very arbitrary

[–] utopiah@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 days ago

What I mean is that MacOS is proprietary and runs on specific hardware, it's by design not meant to be interoperable so it's not "just" popularity.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)