this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2025
694 points (98.3% liked)

196

3817 readers
1977 users here now

Community Rules

You must post before you leave

Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).

Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.

Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.

Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".

Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.

Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.

Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.

Avoid AI generated content.

Avoid misinformation.

Avoid incomprehensible posts.

No threats or personal attacks.

No spam.

Moderator Guidelines

Moderator Guidelines

  • Don’t be mean to users. Be gentle or neutral.
  • Most moderator actions which have a modlog message should include your username.
  • When in doubt about whether or not a user is problematic, send them a DM.
  • Don’t waste time debating/arguing with problematic users.
  • Assume the best, but don’t tolerate sealioning/just asking questions/concern trolling.
  • Ask another mod to take over cases you struggle with, if you get tired, or when things get personal.
  • Ask the other mods for advice when things get complicated.
  • Share everything you do in the mod matrix, both so several mods aren't unknowingly handling the same issues, but also so you can receive feedback on what you intend to do.
  • Don't rush mod actions. If a case doesn't need to be handled right away, consider taking a short break before getting to it. This is to say, cool down and make room for feedback.
  • Don’t perform too much moderation in the comments, except if you want a verdict to be public or to ask people to dial a convo down/stop. Single comment warnings are okay.
  • Send users concise DMs about verdicts about them, such as bans etc, except in cases where it is clear we don’t want them at all, such as obvious transphobes. No need to notify someone they haven’t been banned of course.
  • Explain to a user why their behavior is problematic and how it is distressing others rather than engage with whatever they are saying. Ask them to avoid this in the future and send them packing if they do not comply.
  • First warn users, then temp ban them, then finally perma ban them when they break the rules or act inappropriately. Skip steps if necessary.
  • Use neutral statements like “this statement can be considered transphobic” rather than “you are being transphobic”.
  • No large decisions or actions without community input (polls or meta posts f.ex.).
  • Large internal decisions (such as ousting a mod) might require a vote, needing more than 50% of the votes to pass. Also consider asking the community for feedback.
  • Remember you are a voluntary moderator. You don’t get paid. Take a break when you need one. Perhaps ask another moderator to step in if necessary.

founded 5 months ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Fredthefishlord@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 9 hours ago (11 children)

Insurance exists to allow thieves to get off with your stuff with no recourse? Ignoring anything that could be unrecoverable ~ and that insurance is overpriced for it.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 9 hours ago (10 children)

Gosh I guess that means we should get rid of insurance for things like natural disasters, too, since often your home is unrecoverable in the event of a hurricane, volcano, or some other event with no recourse.

Lmao

[–] Fredthefishlord@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (9 children)

At no point did I argue insurance shouldn't exist. I said they shouldn't be expected to use it as such

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Yet insurance for theft exists because it continues to be a thing that happens. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[–] Fredthefishlord@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Are you intentionally ignoring what I'm trying to say?

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

It feels like it's the other way around, from my end. Natural disasters don't stop happening, and crime doesn't stop happening, ergo, having insurance for both is reasonable.

[–] Fredthefishlord@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

I never said it wasn't. So you misunderstood. Having insurance is reasonable.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

No individual should be expected to use insurance to protect themselves from theft as a solution to it. That’s a crazy take.

Then I really don't understand what you're saying here. Insurance coupled with wiping your device remotely makes you whole and renders your device unusable to the person who stole it (sometimes it even leaves you with a nicer, more current device). It's not like the police do much more to help an individual with theft, even when you can show them where your device is with Find My Device enabled. Sometimes you might get lucky and they'll go retrieve it and allow you to press charges, but that's pretty rare, frankly.

I still maintain this a better solution than trying to beat the shit out of someone, possibly failing and ending up hospitalized or dead yourself.

[–] Fredthefishlord@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I believe it's a reasonable thing morally to do. Maybe not smart. Not going to argue it's the best idea. But, reasonable moral thing to do.

There's games with offline accounts, pictures that don't sync properly -- age of a phone is not the only thing that matters.

I don't think insurance is a bad idea to have, I think the standpoint that insurance should be the only recourse is what's bad

Yes, police will do nothing.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

But, reasonable moral thing to do.

We frankly are just going to continue to disagree on that point. Say you punch the assailant and they go down in one blow, cracking their head on the pavement and dying. Did they really deserve a death penalty for petty theft? An extrajudicial death penalty no less. I don't think so. Thus, I don't think it's reasonably moral to risk it.

[–] Fredthefishlord@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

The difference could lie in the viewpoint that I believe it is their fault in that case. Deserve? No, absolutely not, but I would see it as suicide, rather than an extra judicial punishment. Like falling off a cliff when rock climbing, it's a risk they took when stealing.

The difference is the rock climbing involves an inanimate object, the rock face. You are a thinking being that can make decisions and are choosing to risk their life over a petty crime.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)