this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2025
89 points (97.8% liked)

Wikipedia

3274 readers
103 users here now

A place to share interesting articles from Wikipedia.

Rules:

Recommended:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Coelacanth@feddit.nu 14 points 4 days ago (4 children)

The image has attracted controversy in recent years because of its subject matter, and many journals have deemed it inappropriate and discouraged its use, while others have banned it from publication outright.

Brother, it's a cropped image. Who the fuck cares where it's from? What are we upset about here, a bare naked shoulder? That's some Victorian era level puritanism.

[–] svcg@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 4 days ago (2 children)

The context of a bare naked shoulder is important. If you walked into a male CEOs office and he had a picture on his disk of his wife and his kids in swimsuits at the beach, you would probably feel differently about it than if he had a pin-up poster of a supermodel in a bikini on his wall.

[–] Coelacanth@feddit.nu 9 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I don't know that I think that's a 1-to-1 comparison. If you looked at this picture with no foreknowledge of where it was from or what it was like uncropped you'd think it's a perfectly innocent headshot of a woman. It's not like strapless tops or dresses don't exist, and the hat suggests she's clothed so there is no reason for the mind to jump to the idea that she's naked unless you already know it's from Playboy.

But I don't know, I might just not get it. I had no idea the shoulder was such a big deal so it might just be me there's something wrong with. I feel like I missed a memo. Which does happen a lot, to be honest.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 6 points 4 days ago

Thank god there's no ankle showing!

load more comments (1 replies)