this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2025
87 points (92.2% liked)

chapotraphouse

13929 readers
711 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] iridaniotter@hexbear.net 27 points 21 hours ago (6 children)

Yeah, solarpunk is obviously a reactionary aesthetic. You can read the manifestos of its popularizers and very clearly see the class position of the art movement. How is lionizing the artisan and other middle classes, a reduction in productive capacity, and its desire to revive dead art styles outside of their historical context not reactionary? Stop with the solarpunk and "degrowth" and read more Soviet sci-fi and Chinese five-year plans.

[–] cosmosaucer@hexbear.net 21 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

whats wrong with degrowth? solely educational question if you feel like replying

[–] devils_dust@hexbear.net 7 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

It depends a lot on the context. Degrowth in the imperial core? Sure. In the periphery? Hell nah

There was a relatively recent study about the responsibility about climate change that puts the ratio between north / south countries at 9:1, see https://globalinequality.org/responsibility-for-climate-breakdown/ for further references.

[–] Collatz_problem@hexbear.net 23 points 16 hours ago

Mostly because degrowth can mean everything from "maybe we don't need so many funkopops and ads" to "the peasants should learn to subsist on grass", so it is not by itself meaning anything.

load more comments (3 replies)