this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2025
10 points (85.7% liked)

Technology

39200 readers
249 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Using the system in reverse seems like an interesting idea. I can't see why that wouldn't work either.

[–] AlteredEgo@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 weeks ago

I suspect it might even be easier (forward vs inverse kinematics).

If you could combine both (pressure sensors and pistons) you could do force feedback input devices that can be 3D printed. Which could be useful for serious applications, like controlling a vehicle and "feeling" the road, or feeling the air pressure on the wings of a plane. Or controlling an excavator and "feeling" the earth by measuring feedback in the pneumatic pressure. Currently things like that is really expensive.