this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2025
70 points (100.0% liked)

Moved to gems@fedia.io

0 readers
1 users here now

Moved to !gems@fedia.io

Rules

✏️ If you know the artist, please credit them (memes are fine without it, as it can be difficult to find OOP)

🔞 Tag NSFW (no porn, please. Non-sexual nudity is fine)

🫂 Be respectful of others. It sounds so obvious, but remember you are conversing with another human being

📢 Self promotion is not only allowed, but encouraged. I would love to see your original content

🗳️ No politics (light-hearted jokes are fine)

👍 When in doubt, just post. Unless you are deliberately trying, I most likely won't remove your post

founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] moakley@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It's always interesting to see how art looks different when you see it in real life, and I had the privilege of seeing Lobster Telephone in person when I studied abroad in London.

With that said, the picture absolutely does it justice. Lobster Telephone looks exactly like that. You're pretty much getting the full experience here.

[–] littletoolshed@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Huh, I figured there would have to be something more interesting, like maybe from a different angle? It’s not that I’m questioning the surrealism of the expression, just had hoped for, more?

Is this just a simple combined piece, or did Dali create the phone or lobster from scratch?

[–] moakley@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I couldn't recall, so I looked it up. Apparently the lobsters were custom made from plaster. Dali came up with the idea and design for it, but didn't do the sculpting himself.

In person it looked to me like an old toy, with the paint a bit faded.

But yeah, it's exactly as described. Lobster. Telephone. Didn't even strike me as all that whimsical. Frivolous, but straightforward and not especially fun. Maybe that's the point for some reason.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

or did Dali create the phone .... from scratch?

LOL, do you think he wanted to get sued by AT&T? 'Cause in 1938, that's how you get sued by AT&T, since it was decades before the Carterfone decision.

('Course, it was decades before Hush-A-Phone too, for that matter, but I assume he got away with it because it was a one-off art piece.)

[–] littletoolshed@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

He made ten versions apparently, so not quite one-off; but art nonetheless