NASA

1358 readers

4 users here now

Anything related to the NASA (National Aeronautics and Space Administration); the latest news, events, current and future missions, and more.

Note: This community is an unofficial forum and is unaffiliated with NASA or the U.S. government.

Rules

Be respectful and inclusive.
No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
Engage in constructive discussions.
Share relevant content.
Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
Use appropriate language and tone.
Report violations.
Foster a continuous learning environment.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

L7ePvmEn@lemmy.world

antangil@lemmy.world

[Eric Berger] NASA’s acting chief calls for the end of Earth science at the space agency (arstechnica.com)

submitted 9 months ago by threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works to c/nasa@lemmy.world

9 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works 11 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

We were this close to getting Jared Isaacman... instead, we get this fellow :(

[–] Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Not that the current situation is any better, but I find it extremely weird that everyone was cheering for a billionaire that sees space exploration as his hobby to be NASA admin.

[–] Infinite@lemmy.zip 10 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I think the key qualification is, Isaacman wouldn't have been trying to destroy NASA.

[–] Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I know that, but a lot of people were cheering a lot louder than if they had cheered for someone who's best qualification is that he won't destroy NASA.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

The tech bros liked him because he's a tech bro. Reasonable people thought he was the best we could hope for under the circumstances.