this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2025
206 points (99.5% liked)

New York Times gift articles

1649 readers
43 users here now

Share your New York Times gift articles links here.

Rules:

Info:

Tip:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BussyGyatt@feddit.org 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

yeah i read it don't interrobang at me like i pissed in your cereal.

it's absurd that apparently the most compelling case to make against the existence of a Concentration Camp is a temporary injunction against new prisoners and construction on ecological grounds until the case can be brought before a supreme court that, i dunno about you, but i dont expect to be terribly sympathetic to the ecological argument quite frankly. and like, yeah the article does specify that they should dismantle the generators and stuff but like, uh... who's enforcing that, exactly? i mean what's stopping them from just, y'know. not complying. again. with another court order. about migrants. another one.

but like yeah for sure they got al capone on the tax evasion thing so sure if it sticks i guess. i'm already holding my breath in anticipation.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

Take a step back, BIG breath. All the judge had to work with was the environmental issue, that's what the case challenged. She cannot bring additional challenges.

And YES, enforcement is the next question, and we all know how that will play out.