this post was submitted on 14 May 2026
102 points (100.0% liked)

Linux

17513 readers
65 users here now

Welcome to c/linux!

Welcome to our thriving Linux community! Whether you're a seasoned Linux enthusiast or just starting your journey, we're excited to have you here. Explore, learn, and collaborate with like-minded individuals who share a passion for open-source software and the endless possibilities it offers. Together, let's dive into the world of Linux and embrace the power of freedom, customization, and innovation. Enjoy your stay and feel free to join the vibrant discussions that await you!

Rules:

  1. Stay on topic: Posts and discussions should be related to Linux, open source software, and related technologies.

  2. Be respectful: Treat fellow community members with respect and courtesy.

  3. Quality over quantity: Share informative and thought-provoking content.

  4. No spam or self-promotion: Avoid excessive self-promotion or spamming.

  5. No NSFW adult content

  6. Follow general lemmy guidelines.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The coordinated effort worked. When lawmakers finalized Colorado SB26-051, they added Section 6-30-105(e) to the text. This specific clause waives compliance for operating systems and applications distributed under licenses that allow copying, modifying, and redistributing without platform-imposed technical restrictions. Why the Section 6-30-105(e) Exemption Protects Decentralized Tech

This exemption establishes a formal legislative precedent for the tech industry. It legally shields free and open-source operating systems from hardware-level age attestation laws that closed ecosystems like iOS and Windows will soon have to follow.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago (6 children)

There is a very easy way to force linux users to enforce this. However, I won't give it away here, because as far as I can tell the current law makers are clueless.

And I don't want to give them clues.

[–] kotsune@ani.social 1 points 49 minutes ago

I don’t see any real way, unless they’re going to require age verification to connect to the internet in the first place.

[–] nullify3112@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

My fellow lemming, your lawmakers are not on here don’t worry.

[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago

There isn’t an easy way. There may be a way to enforce it when you connect to a remote site, but that requires the remote computer to implement it, not you.

[–] SeeMarkFly@lemmy.ml 7 points 3 days ago

Our current law makers are still debating if freeing the slaves was a good idea. That's how far behind they are.

[–] potatoguy@mbin.potato-guy.space 7 points 3 days ago (3 children)

I'm already seeing that in a year or two, we're getting blocked on websites or electron applications because of age verification just like in android with Google Play Services. Like use age verification software or get blocked for 99% the internet.

They don't even need to turn it into law.

[–] fushuan@piefed.blahaj.zone 7 points 2 days ago

Whatever device based verification those websites or electron apps were communicating with can be spoofed in a system where you have complete control.

Games are cracked in weeks at most, don't you think that whatever secure communication is established won't be cracked lightning fast by the whole FOSS community? Once the "secure communication" between local apps is broken, a third package can mitm that shit easily. It's a local environment.

[–] Coldcell@sh.itjust.works 10 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Honestly the faster they try to lock us out of the web the sooner we can get a second, freer web with card games and prostitution.

[–] quips@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 day ago

Blackjack and hookers for 500 please

[–] comrade_twisty@feddit.org 3 points 3 days ago

So just like the old net before Google, Meta and Amazon :)

[–] FudgyMcTubbs@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

"Like putting too much air in a balloon!"

[–] badgermurphy@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Like a balloon, ...and something bad happens!

[–] caseyweederman@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That may be my favorite line from the whole show

[–] badgermurphy@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

It is a classic. Another of my favorites: "At the risk of sounding negative, no!"

[–] badgermurphy@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

That's true and I bet its a big part of the plan. The good parts for us about that approach, though, is that the bad technology is baked into the services, not the user's software, and the system depends on the tech oligopoly remaining. Laws are more durable than trends, so maybe that could be better for online privacy long-term, because the oligopoly will eventually break up. If we're real lucky, some of them won't survive the AI bubble aftermath enough to participate in this.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 days ago

I am very glad that you have strategically selected which parts of your mind to lose.