this post was submitted on 17 May 2026
7 points (100.0% liked)

AskHistorians

1319 readers
7 users here now

QUESTIONS

  1. Be civil.
  2. Be specific.
  3. Historical topic must be from at least 20 years ago.
  4. Post questions in the title. Elaboration is for the text box.

RESPONSES

  1. Be civil.
  2. Provide comprehensive answers.
  3. Please provide primary and secondary sources upon good faith request. Tertiary sources, like Wikipedia, are not accepted.

askhistorians is a community for academic answers to questions about history. Polls, opinions, bigotry, grammar pedantry, and personal insults will be removed.


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PugJesus@piefed.social 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

He was the head of the government which replaced the one which negotiated the Treaty of Sevres. Effectively, once Ataturk caused the Treaty of Sevres to be scrapped, as a whole, Western interest in the notion of an independent Kurdistan faded. Much of that land Turkiye was unwilling to give up, plebiscite or no plebescite, and a major reason for Kurdistan, by the calculations of the Western powers, was to weaken Turkiye - something which the Turks were not particularly willing to accept once a treaty not-at-gunpoint was being negotiated.

The interests of the Kurdish people themselves, naturally, were ignored in these calculations. No friends but the mountains...