this post was submitted on 20 May 2026
289 points (100.0% liked)

Programmer Humor

31505 readers
1514 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 3 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

I was trying to see what AI says this time about the bubble and it was kind of interesting. This is from Gemini btw:

Question: But Google is switching to AI search only and everyone hates AI that I know. Isn't that going to be a problem?

Yes, the intense public backlash against AI search is a major risk for Google, but the company is trapped in what economists call the "Innovator's Dilemma"—they must force AI search on users to protect their monopoly, even if people hate it. Google's sweeping AI Search overhaul has sparked heavy criticism over inaccurate answers, cluttered layouts, and a ruined web ecosystem. However, understanding why they are doing it reveals the corporate survival strategy at play.

The Problem: Why Everyone is Frustrated

  • The Accuracy Deficit: Users are highly vocal about AI "hallucinations". When people want hard facts, a summarized paragraph that is only "mostly accurate" is a massive step backward from a trusted link.
  • The "Web-Laundering" Backlash: Independent publishers, bloggers, and creators are furious. Google's AI scrapes their data, answers the question directly on the page, and deprives the original creator of website clicks. This threatens to destroy the very content ecosystem Google relies on.
  • The "Web-Clean" Workaround: The dislike of these features is prominent enough that a growing number of tech-savvy users are actively using URL filters like &udm=14 to strip AI elements and force Google back to the classic "ten blue links" format.

Why Google is Doing It Anyway

Despite the clear user pushback, Google's leadership is deliberately choosing to cannibalize its own classic search experience for two critical reasons:

  • The Threat of Total Obsolescence: If Google does not build an AI "answer engine," users might completely migrate to OpenAI, Perplexity, or ChatGPT for their everyday queries. Google would rather you be annoyed by their AI than fall in love with a competitor's AI.
  • The "Silent Majority" Metric: While power users and creators complain loudly on platforms like Reddit and X, Google's internal data shows that the general public is adapting. At the recent conference, Google VP Elizabeth Reid revealed that AI Mode usage has been doubling every quarter, quietly crossing over 1 billion monthly active users. For basic, casual queries, the passive majority takes the trade-off of quick answers over clicking links.

Why Google Can Afford the Backlash (For Now)

A full-blown consumer revolt is unlikely to break Google anytime soon due to their massive structural defense mechanisms:

  • Unshakable Monopoly: As of early 2026, Google still commands over 90% of the global search market share. Bing sits at a distant 5%. Because consumers have no true equivalent alternative for mass searching, Google can weather significant user dissatisfaction without losing its user base.
  • Default Ecosystems: Google pays billions annually to remain the default search engine on Apple iPhones and Safari browsers. Unless consumers manually dive into their settings to change their default search provider, they will continue to use Google by default.
[–] affenlehrer@feddit.org 1 points 4 hours ago

Understanding questions and summarizing information is a field where LLMs are quite good at. If they actually look up the sources and "read" the websites they are often able to give good answers. If they don't use tools and just answer from what they "remember", the information often contains hallucinations.

So from a user perspective I think search will get better for specific questions.

However, traffic to websites and all the things the LLMs omits are lost. If the LLMs gives you the answer you don't learn about the author of the information, the design of the website, the nuanced and maybe thoughtful story the author built around the information and all the other stuff the author put there.