this post was submitted on 21 May 2026
255 points (100.0% liked)

Privacy

48742 readers
962 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] humble_boatsman@sh.itjust.works 44 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I can't sleep anymore reading this stuff. The only chance that this can ever be regulated out of existence is through far reaching federal legislation that reinforces the 4th amendment in the digital age. And we know there is zero chance of that.

The public space has never included a true right to privacy but the raw intake and storage and analysis of your every biometric and existence to create a profile on every figure regardless of threat or action in society is a fucking Invasion of being.

[–] SinAdjetivos@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago (3 children)

The whole point is to change the risk calculations people make in order to make "civil" and "polite" actions such as protests, legislation, etc. more risky and therefore most people are less likely to engage in.

What these dumb asses don't realize is that if the level of risk for the "peaceful" options rises to the same level as alternatives, which are arguably much more effective, then those are going to be the only recourse people have and the actions people will take.

I do believe your analysis is correct about there being zero chance of it being legislated away. So now what?

[–] Vendetta9076@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 hours ago

The answer is the alternatives or get crushes under the boot heel.

[–] turtlesareneat@piefed.ca 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Remember all those dystopian movies that were trying to warn us? Well now they're guides.

[–] humble_boatsman@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] youcantreadthis@quokk.au 1 points 1 day ago

Anything simple enough for either of us to consciously understand would almost certainly be wrong

[–] youcantreadthis@quokk.au 2 points 1 day ago

I really liked the idea of peaceful options I got to feel all star fleet and shit about it

[–] youcantreadthis@quokk.au 8 points 1 day ago

When they remove peaceful options

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

relying on an unjust law system amd corrupt politicians is a no starter. the only way is for the general public to stop consenting to it.

they sell us hard on nothing to fear/nothing to hide rhetoric for a reason.

[–] humble_boatsman@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Me: I don't consent to invasion of my being.

General public: k.

E: Shareholders: Jack Nicholson nodding yes menacingly

[–] f3nyx@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

even worse: I brought up flock cameras to an aquaintance and their response was essentially "why is that so bad, they already have all our data from our phones, what's one more set of cameras"

[–] ScoffingLizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 13 hours ago

I swear to fuck. It's like talking to brick walls. You have the freedom to control your phone.