this post was submitted on 26 May 2026
575 points (98.3% liked)

Technology

84961 readers
4317 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
575
'People will buy intelligence from us on a meter': ChatGPT's Sam Altman's AI vision worries critics (www.tomsguide.com)
submitted 1 day ago by LuminousLuddite@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
198 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Sam Altman says OpenAI wants to sell intelligence like a utility

During a recent appearance at BlackRock in Washington, D.C., OpenAI's Sam Altman, shared his vision for the future of AI. At one point saying, “We see a future where intelligence is a utility, like electricity or water, and people buy it from us on a meter.”

Altman was describing a world where AI becomes a foundational infrastructure, something woven into everyday life so deeply that consumers and businesses simply “plug into” it the same way they rely on electricity, Wi-Fi or running water.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Hellgruen@lemmy.zip 19 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

LLMs are not intelligent lol

[–] cardfire@sh.itjust.works 5 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

I feel like I spend months trying to find the right phrase the people will understand when I mention llms, since I refuse to call these things artificial intelligence.

My favorite thus far, are "spicy autocorrect" and "next words calculator." The fact that it has all of the compendium of human knowledge on physics or last millennium economics, means it is an excellent research assistant and engineering consultant, as long as I can keep in mind that it's going to lie to me with impunity and with utmost confidence every fourth question I ask.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 4 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

That's the problem, a public archive with all it's training data that you can query would be infinitely more valuable.

[–] cardfire@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 hours ago

I mean, mostly yes, but also I did benefit from an LLM arguing with me and telling me to not be so cavalier with 15kwh of batteries. It was helpful to have some safety guard rails. It was useful for giving more expansive considerations and playing devil's advocate against my designs.

I only shocked myself twice, from the solar panels. 😅

[–] thermal_shock@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

The Google AI overview is so often wrong when I ask it basic questions like who is in a TV show or movie, it's unfucking believable. I'm very anti-Ai. It only creates bad, not good

https://youtu.be/FQpZdCKgc6w

[–] Holytimes@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 hours ago

It has actually only created a single good. Better language translators. Every major translator has been "ai" based since about 2016. The recent speed up of llms have massively improved their accurate ability to retain context and pick up on slang and colloquialisms.

Its seriously night and day how fucking good translators got entirely thanks to ai.

But that's literally the only thing I've seen come out of llms that was worth two fucking shits.