this post was submitted on 27 May 2026
24 points (77.3% liked)
Books
8055 readers
87 users here now
A community for all things related to Books.
Rules
- Be Nice. No personal attacks or hate speech.
- No spam. All posts should be related to discussion or reviews related to books. (Please avoid posts that are just a link to the book and a generic summary)
- No self promotion.
Official Bingo Posts:
Related Communities
- !books@piefed.world (Piefed Sibling Community)
- !comicbooks@lemmy.world
- !fantasy@lemmy.ml
Community icon by IconsBox (from freepik.com)
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Bodine (1975) – Androcentrism in Prescriptive Grammar
Excerpt of AI-generated findings:
Actual abstract from that article:
So you got AI to hallucinate a summary of a 1975 paper.
To talk about a book published in 1969.
Weird that the AI didn't summarize what Le Guin herself said on the topic.
It's almost as if reaching for AI isn't the smartest idea.
I think you saw me say "AI" and replied too quickly. I didn't cite Le Guin. I used AI as a search tool to highlight one example of a paper discussing how the neutral "they" was commonplace during the time. I know it's just search results, which is why I disclaimed it was as such. Then I included the paper's abstract, which stands on its own enough to make the point that talking about a hypothetical era without the neutral "they" is not applicable to 1969.
this is lemmy dude.
AI is evil and bad, no matter it's use or context.
almost like your choice of pronouns for a singular person in written language... is also now problematic and offensive to whomever, and le guin is clearly was anti-trans or something for not knowing that in 2026 kids would be reading her 1969 novel and getting bent out of shape about her pronoun use not reflecting their own contemporary beliefs about it.