this post was submitted on 29 May 2026
122 points (97.7% liked)

Technology

84996 readers
3486 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SnoringEarthworm@sh.itjust.works 7 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

I see nothing wrong with someone having two homes.

I do.

I used to get my meals from food pantries and churches.

The rule was: no one gets seconds until everyone's been served.

If that makes me an evil commie or something, fine. It feels less evil than homelessness and plural homeownership existing at the same time.

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip -1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Sure, but I don't think the existence of Airbnb has much impact on homelessness

[–] WraithGear@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

does people having multiple homes and driving up the price of housing contribute to homelessness?

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 1 points 35 minutes ago

Probably less than you're trying to imply. The biggest factors in homelessness are mental illness and drug addiction, not cost or availability of housing.

[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works -1 points 4 hours ago

But why should your food bank or church allow you to have seconds when there are other food banks and churches out there that ran out early before serving everyone? Why should you get a food bank at all when there are places that have none?!

This logic can always be applied to any situation because there are always worse situations to be found. You're not solving anything by tearing down the guy who now earns enough to buy a meal or two at a restaurant in comparison because he's not far off from your own situation. Attack the guy who buys the $10,000 lunch and doesn't even finish it. They're the tiny minority that have the biggest impact on the rest of us.