this post was submitted on 30 May 2026
72 points (96.2% liked)

Technology

976 readers
102 users here now

Share interesting Technology news and links.

Rules:

  1. No paywalled sites at all.
  2. News articles has to be recent, not older than 2 weeks (14 days).
  3. No external video links, only native(.mp4,...etc) links under 5 mins.
  4. Post only direct links.

To encourage more original sources and keep this space commercial free as much as I could, the following websites are Blacklisted:

More sites will be added to the blacklist as needed.

Encouraged:

Misc:

Relevant Lemmy Communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dan@upvote.au 4 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

I know people at work that spend much, much more than this. They're what I'd describe as "fully AI native". Honestly I don't know how they handle it since it seems like a lot of work.

They have over a dozen agents, all using Claude Opus in fast mode. The agents have roles - for example, one for technical architecture, one for UI design, one for building overall plans, one for coding, one for security review, one for code review, etc. They run codemods (automated code cleanup and migration to newer APIs) using AI. Their backlog/wishlist tasks are completed using AI. They have several OpenClaw-style bots that respond to Google Chat messages, run periodic jobs, summarize emails, etc.

If you want an extreme example... The developer of OpenClaw is "spending" $1.3 million per month on its development: https://www.businessinsider.com/openclaw-peter-steinberger-ai-token-bill-2026-5. He works at OpenAI so of course he doesn't have to pay for it.

You could build a significantly better, higher quality product if you spent that much on actual humans...