this post was submitted on 03 Jun 2026
48 points (86.4% liked)

Technology

85108 readers
4572 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
48
China Aims A.I. at Predicting Who Could Pose a Political Risk (www.nytimes.com)
submitted 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) by Wudi@feddit.uk to c/technology@lemmy.world
11 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] underThunder@thelemmy.club 18 points 22 hours ago (6 children)

Probably happening in the US as well.

[–] belochka@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

Usually the place of origin of a technology is also where most its uses are pioneered.

[–] GalacticSushi@piefed.blahaj.zone 11 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Probably?

We’re going to have supervision. Every police officer is going to be supervised at all times, and if there’s a problem, AI will report that problem and report it to the appropriate person. Citizens will be on their best behavior because we are constantly recording and reporting everything that’s going on.

That's from Larry Ellison about a year and a half ago

[–] belochka@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

And he started with police officers being supervised, but the real problem is not what we all see about an event, it's whether we who see it one way have power over those who pretend they saw something else. So if those deciding also don't want to reduce police officers' loyalty to their superiors and readiness to obey on the job, they might find an excuse for a clear murder in FHD.

[–] greenbit@lemmy.zip 4 points 14 hours ago

Yes. The people controlling the nations never put USA and China against each other, they were just competing which method gets the most control faster. Now they're using the internet to propagandize China as an alternative to the failed US, when it's only more of the same

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 18 points 21 hours ago

Literally Palantir's fucking business model.

[–] adarza@piefed.ca 14 points 22 hours ago

i believe that's one of the reasons why they ('doge', et al) was raiding all the government systems and stealing all the data... to build such a thing for the chief grifter/wanna be dick-tator and his masters.

[–] THE_GR8_MIKE@lemmy.world 6 points 21 hours ago

Be funny as fuck when it just runs a circle and points right back at them. "Uh, it appears to be you." it says in a robotic bri'ish voice.