this post was submitted on 04 Jun 2026
230 points (98.3% liked)

Technology

85134 readers
4186 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] IratePirate@feddit.org 17 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

50 years from now, people will look upon unregulated algorithmic "social" media the same way as we today look upon unregulated smoking in the 50s. "How could they? Didn't they know it was addictive as hell and terrible for your health and that of your kids?"

That is, if there are still any people left 50 years from now...

[–] myrmidex@belgae.social 6 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

That is, if there are still any people left 50 years from now...

Or preserved articles stating the effects of social media. I reckon all the papers will be bought up and their archives 'adapted to suit the new times better'.

[–] MangoCats@feddit.it 3 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I don't think they'll be able to make the papers go away, what they will do is "flood the zone" with "overwhelming evidence" that the papers are absurd lies and fantastical fiction, like Roswell and Area 51...

[–] myrmidex@belgae.social 1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Hmm true, drown it out. Still, future archaeologists might prove adept at surfacing the actual articles. After the first of those is made public, the entire archives might still get wiped or 'adapted'.

[–] MangoCats@feddit.it 2 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

My suspicion is that the Epstein files are packed full of garbage, there are truths in there, but they have likely pushed in so much obvious falsehood as well that they can convince some audiences to ignore the whole thing as a pack of lies.

As for your archaeologists, some will no doubt find the truth and recognize it for that it is, but will they be allowed to effectively communicate their findings to the masses? I suspect that all depends on who is in charge.

I suspect we've got quite the chaotic froth of "who's in charge" of the world today.

[–] myrmidex@belgae.social 1 points 13 hours ago

Very good point, can't argue that.