this post was submitted on 04 Jun 2026
51 points (94.7% liked)

Privacy

48921 readers
406 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

My current car is old. I had a lot of repairs done on it recently. If I get a new car, I don't want features. Lane assist, backup camera, DUI Camera, telemetry, auto breaking or other frankly silly features. Call me grumpy, but I find modern cars very distracting.

Can I ask a dealership to disable these at purchase? Is there a car that works best for being private besides just older cars?

I drive very little in a year. No, I can't ride a bike.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] chillpanzee@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Adding to your point... "impaired driver detection" is already federal law, however it is still held up in the federal rulemaking process. There were (if I recall) deadlines in 2024 and 2026, but the rule making process can take a long ass time, so for now, it is still a future thing, but I mention it to say that there is broad congressional support for in-car surveillance tech. It's definitely coming.

The main problem with this is, 1. It could void your warranty

Manufacturers cannot void the warranty because of aftermarket modifications. They can deny claims for failures that are caused by the aftermarket modifications, but they cannot "void" a warranty. In several years of working on this stuff, the only times I ever saw voided warranties was when cars were salvage branded titles, such as from total loss accidents, flood recoveries and so on. And even in those cases, federal emissions equipment warranties remained in effect. There are reasonably strong consumer protections for aftermarket modifications that go back several decades. They don't entirely stop manufacturers from doing dodgy shit, but it has limited it.

[–] atrielienz@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Good point, and a good thing to add to things to consider. Thank you.

I was more thinking along the lines of the different classes of warrantable repairs and different classes of recalls.

You could absolutely have a recall pertinent to your vehicle that turns out to be voluntary and the automaker refuses to honor it if that system has been deactivated, tampered with, or modified.

[–] chillpanzee@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago

You could absolutely have a recall pertinent to your vehicle that turns out to be voluntary and the automaker refuses to honor it if that system has been deactivated, tampered with, or modified.

Yeah, this could happen, but in most cases, you take your car to the dealership for recalls. And the dealer isn't the manufacturer, they don't care if you disable manufacturer shit. The dealer could get stinky and say no on the manufacturers behalf, but they would rather do the simple work and get paid for it, then try to upsell you on preventive maintenance like an oil change, tires, etc.. Unless you're doing something that'll come back to them (like odometer fraud), they're not gonna go out of their way (and spend 5x the time) to deny a recall claim that even the manufacturer doesn't give a shit about paying. That was my experience anyway.