this post was submitted on 04 Jun 2026
-34 points (16.0% liked)

Technology

85134 readers
4251 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
-34
When AI builds itself (www.anthropic.com)
submitted 10 hours ago by unpossum@sh.itjust.works to c/technology@lemmy.world
7 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

An interesting look at what Anthropic sees as the future of AI research, and how their internal use of Claude has changed over the last year

Claude-written code was somewhat worse than human-written code at Anthropic in late 2025, is roughly at parity today, and we expect it to be strictly better within the year.

but also

Work (and life) ran on a gift economy of small favors between humans. ‘Can you help me get this script running?’ [...] each one created a little debt, a little mutual awareness. [Claude is] faster, it creates zero debt, but each of these is a lost bid for human collaboration.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NewOldGuard@lemmy.ml 0 points 5 hours ago

Even the premise that LLMs write as good of code as a human today is marketing BS. I work in software, I've seen what Claude code does when set loose on our repos already. Its output is unreliable, inefficient, doesn't meet security standards, and always requires manual intervention to bug-fix. It produces worse code much faster