this post was submitted on 06 Jun 2026
452 points (98.9% liked)

Greentext

8315 readers
778 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Gonzako@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I personally really enjoyed it. Post nut clarity really helps engage with the philosophic part of the game

[–] errer@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Hmmm yes I’m feeling particularly philosophical while playing this one

[–] lyralycan@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

That PVC model butt tho

[–] peteypete420@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The way you described it makes it sound boring

[–] mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works -5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

The philosophic part is the worst part

It's just a ham-fisted clusterfuck on a scale worse than the original ending of Evangelion (and that franchise also sucks btw)

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Why did you play until it became philosophical if you didn't like it?

[–] mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works 5 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

It's called giving the game a chance.

Also, that's not the quality of retort you think it is. Having a lot of players getting bored and dropping a game before it gets "good" is a bad thing

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 0 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

It's called giving the game a chance.

,If you don't enjoy the gameplay after let's say 2 hours, it's fine to just stop. If you play something without enjoying it, that's on you.

Having a lot of players getting bored and dropping a game before it gets "good" is a bad thing

I'm not aware that many players dropped the game. AAFAIK, the game was positively received and many people liked it.

And I didn't say that it takes a while to "get good". I said that it takes a while for the philosophical themes to show.

[–] mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works 0 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I'm not aware that many players dropped the game. AAFAIK, the game was positively received and many people liked it.

Most people that drop a game out of boredom don't tend to talk about it that much. That just lets the diehard fans dictate the narrative about it, especially for one that requires multiple playthroughs like Nier

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 2 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

It's well liked by critics (88% on metacritic) and the audience (very positive on steam). Your opinion is an outlier. Let other people enjoy things.

It doesn't require multiple playthroughs. The game's chapters are just structured in a weird way. Each "playthrough" that's required has a different perspective and/or story than the last one.

Even if you consider each chapter a "playthrough", then each of those is just a few hours.

[–] mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works -1 points 14 hours ago

(88% on metacritic)

There's plenty of movies on metacritic with high rating but completely boring. Not really a good metric for quality