this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2026
901 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

85330 readers
4410 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kevinsky@feddit.nl 35 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (2 children)

It also draws a bunch of negative attention to Samsung for this scummy move. Ideally more media pick this up.

That samsung doesn't have a replacement drive in stock is a blatant lie. They just want to sell him one for the inflated price.

They never used to give you full refunds when these drives lost value over time. And if they did it wasn't what you paid origionally. Now their price is ballooned and suddenly they are eager to do so.

It's extremely clear what Samsung is doing here.

Edit/Addendum that i take no credit for:

Evidently it's against their own warranty terms: https://semiconductor.samsung.com/consumer-storage/support/warranty/

In the event Samsung determines, in its sole discretion, that the Product suffers from defects in material or workmanship and does not substantially conform to the published specifications under normal use, for as long as You own the Product and during the limited warranty period, and subject to the conditions and exceptions stated in this Agreement, Samsung will, at its option, either: (1) repair or replace the Product with new or refurbished Product of equal or greater capacity and functionality; or (2) refund the then current market value of the Product at the time the warranty claim is made to Samsung if Samsung is unable to repair or replace the Product.

[–] Ledivin@lemmy.world 1 points 19 minutes ago* (last edited 19 minutes ago)

Also in that policy, however:

IN NO EVENT WILL SAMSUNG’S LIABILITY EXCEED THE AMOUNT PAID BY YOU FOR THE PRODUCT.

Shitty? Absolutely. Legally sound? Could really go either way.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

Its crazy that a small claim made the news to be honest.

[–] Flagstaff@programming.dev 2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

It's probably because it's Louis Rossmann against Samsung (both giants in their respective fields)...

[–] kieron115@startrek.website 4 points 1 hour ago

It's definitely because of Louis. He's been doing a lot of work in the right to repair field, as well as this whole fuckin fiasco that Bambu (the 3d printer company) got themselves into by violating the LGPL license with some software. Streisand'ed themselves good on that one.

[–] Holytimes@sh.itjust.works 1 points 59 minutes ago

Even a small court can have a notable impact when it's between not able figures.

This is less about the case and more about the message. Hench why it makes the news.