78
We May Be Surrounded by Trillions of Conscious Beings, Research Suggests—And They Aren’t Human
(www.popularmechanics.com)
A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.
dart board;; science bs
rule #1: be kind
Sounds a little hippy to me but 'there are more things in Heaven and Earth than are dreamt of in your philosophy' so if it is the case we will still need a word for what consciousness did mean. Why not leave consciousness alone and find a new word to mean the interconnectedness of grifting ideas to make a living.
awareness
Yeah...
Because it is?
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-022-10068-4
Most people just can't understand that shit, so when someone talks about it in easy to use terms, it sounds "a little hippy".
Like, that's where the hippies got their words from in the first place bro...
"Vibing" is an accurate scientific description of two consciousnesses that are agreeable with each other. The people saying it don't always understand it, but most of what "hippies" say about consciousness is pretty fucking accurate.
Why keep insisting the people who always used the term correctly stop because it doesn't match the simplified version you were taught decades ago in jr high?
The forced degradation of words is unhelpful, a word will still be needed to differentiate the unparalleled state of mind from the emerging properties of complex systems. Concepts like consciousness and God are often commandeered to peddle tenuous ideas to the great unwashed and it is ultimately unsustainable. And while we are about it computational modelling is a license to find what you want to find.
Then stop doing it...
You're trying to make people who use the word correctly stop, because you never knew what it meant.
And of fucking course youre plugging chat it's now.
Science isn't a philosophy, its a process for approaching the truth. Yes, I can't prove what I am saying and it is based more on a strong feeling than direct proof. I think the question of consciousness is a particularly important one, and we know very little about it still.
Your first line is science is a means to find truth, your second line is I have no proof I just feel it.
Edit. I did not mean for that to sound so aggressive, I disagree with some of what you said but you are genuine.
The science is the means, not the truth.
Well, the scientific method is, not sure if that also applies to the definition of science as s singular word.
You treat science/knowledge as a philosophy when it is inherently incomplete and always will be.