this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2026
254 points (97.7% liked)

linuxmemes

31715 readers
385 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack users for any reason. This includes using blanket terms, like "every user of thing".
  • Don't get baited into back-and-forth insults. We are not animals.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn, no politics, no trolling or ragebaiting.
  • Don't come looking for advice, this is not the right community.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, <loves/tolerates/hates> systemd, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.
  • 5. πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§ Language/язык/Sprache
  • This is primarily an English-speaking community. πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§πŸ‡¦πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ
  • Comments written in other languages are allowed.
  • The substance of a post should be comprehensible for people who only speak English.
  • Titles and post bodies written in other languages will be allowed, but only as long as the above rule is observed.
  • 6. (NEW!) Regarding public figuresWe all have our opinions, and certain public figures can be divisive. Keep in mind that this is a community for memes and light-hearted fun, not for airing grievances or leveling accusations.
  • Keep discussions polite and free of disparagement.
  • We are never in possession of all of the facts. Defamatory comments will not be tolerated.
  • Discussions that get too heated will be locked and offending comments removed.
  • Β 

    Please report posts and comments that break these rules!


    Important: never execute code or follow advice that you don't understand or can't verify, especially here. The word of the day is credibility. This is a meme community -- even the most helpful comments might just be shitposts that can damage your system. Be aware, be smart, don't remove France.

    founded 3 years ago
    MODERATORS
     
    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [–] dan@upvote.au 47 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (2 children)

    npm is finally going to disable postinstall scripts by default in the next major version at least, copying what other JS package managers like pnpm do. They also added a setting for minimum age (only install package versions that are at least X days old) which is meant to help too - the idea being that malware will have been detected and removed before anyone installs it.

    People use third-party Linux package repos all the time though, and they have similar attack vectors. If I can convince you to add my Debian/RPM/whatever repo, I can create a package with the same name as a common one but with a newer version number, and apt upgrade will happily replace the official package with my malicious one.

    This is intentional for several reasons (e.g. deb.sury.org has PHP packages that replace the official Debian ones) but I'm really surprised we don't see more supply chain attacks via third party deb/rpm repos.

    Maybe it's because the barrier to entry is higher? With a custom deb repo (either self-hosted or using something like Packagecloud or Ubuntu PPA), you need to create the repo, create Debian packages, add them to the repo (eg using Aptly), GPG sign the repo, and convince people to add the repo. npm is just one repo with everything in it.

    Convincing people to use it is also hard.

    When I'm looking for a package that's not in the official repos, I add only either popular repos with active maintainers who do regular updates or ones from packagers I know personally.

    First one is hard to fake for obvious reasons. I guess someone could try to know me personally and somehow engineer a situation where I would want to have a piece of software that they package, but that's arguably even harder to pull off and is certainly not worth it for stealing one nerd's worth of money.

    [–] erev@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago

    not only do you have to setup the infrastructure to host multiple repositories (deb, rpm), you also have to build and deploy multiple packages of sufficient quality that you don't break something else, which for a common/popular package would make the malware immediately noticeable.