this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2026
632 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

85420 readers
6332 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kuhli@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I don't think a statement is really needed here, this wasn't a vulnerability, the code was never called. Even if the code were called, the $10,000 bounty is for a different type of bug entirely too

[–] baines@lemmy.cafe 3 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

so stacking vulnerabilities is a thing

if the code exists it can be called

this is a valid bug and it’s silly to rule lawyer something like this

so good job amd, you are ‘actually’ right,

this totally won’t cost you in the long run at all

god damn do lawyers and business majors need to stop making tech decisions