this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2026
22 points (100.0% liked)
Asklemmy
54555 readers
672 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- !lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~
founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
The "Republic Srbpska" went from 55% Serbs to 90% Serbs by genociding Bosnians
Nobody denied this genocide, but you apparently deny all the others in Yugoslavia, just as US propaganda want.
It's a hyperbole of course there are some things which favored the Bosnians but likewise you can have Zionists saying NATO is pro-Palestine because NATO did a pro-Palestine thing once.
The process and end result was heavily Serb favored by NATO.
The casualty statistics as BE mentions in video chapter 2 "both sides are bad" (hey that's what this argument is about how convenient) are also just telling by themselves:
83% of Bosnians killed were civilians. But “only” 10% of Serbs killed were civilians. This by itself basically proves that Bosnians did commit massacres on civilians but it wasn’t top-down policy like it was for the Serbs.