Technology

85461 readers

4053 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related news or articles.
Be excellent to each other!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

L3s@lemmy.world

enu@lemmy.world

technopagan@lemmy.world

L4s@lemmy.world

L3s@hackingne.ws

396

UK: Under-16s to be banned from social media, Starmer announces (www.bbc.co.uk)

submitted 1 day ago by Tarambor@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

193 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Under-16s will be banned from using social media, Prime Minister Keir Starmer has announced.

Starmer says social media is making children unhappy, making it easier for bullies to abuse children, and is "designed to be addictive". A ban would give children more time, security, and more freedom to grow up - as well as more opportunities, he adds.

"That is all any parent wants. They want to know that Britain will be better for their children, that they will get a fair chance," the PM says in a speech in Downing Street.

Starmer adds that the government is "not prepared to compromise" on the safety and happiness of children - and that includes in the regulation and enforcement of this ban. He says the government has listened to and learned from countries like Australia, where a similar ban has already been introduced.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 30 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

" designed to be addictive ". So you think adults are somehow magically exempt from addiction?

[–] Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 10 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Adults are allowed to choose to become addicts.

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

but we still regulate harmful addicting substances, no?

[–] Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 7 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

For children yes, and when it affects others safety like with drunk driving. If an adult wants to fuck off in the woods and become an addict, thats entirely acceptable. Apparently some adults think that when we protect vulnerable people that we are taking their freedoms away.

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

If you're referring to me, you have the very wrong end of the stick.

The irony is in admitting this shit is harmful and addictive...but uh, only for those too young to monetize.

[–] Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 1 points 57 minutes ago

I think its well known its addictive for everyone, but profit and convenience are the most important things to Americans, so here we are.

[–] SaraTonin@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

There are definitely plenty of addictive substances which are banned in the UK

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 3 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

And plenty that are not. What's your point? Ban alcohol, cigarettes and sport bets?

[–] SaraTonin@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

My point is exactly what I said. I don’t know how much clearer I could have been, TBH, if my post is read in the context of the three proceeding it

[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 6 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

All drugs to be legalized when?

[–] garbage_world@lemmy.world -1 points 7 hours ago

Taking drugs have negative effect on others