this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2026
1 points (53.3% liked)
AskHistorians
1369 readers
34 users here now
QUESTIONS
- Be civil.
- Be specific.
- Historical topic must be from at least 20 years ago.
- Post questions in the title. Elaboration is for the text box.
RESPONSES
- Be civil.
- Provide comprehensive answers.
- Please provide primary and secondary sources upon good faith request. Tertiary sources, like Wikipedia, are not accepted.
askhistorians is a community for academic answers to questions about history. Polls, opinions, bigotry, grammar pedantry, and personal insults will be removed.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Sexy sure, but sexualised is the "sexy lamp" problem, where if you swapped the character for a sexy lamp, you wouldn't notice.
There's also the needless poses that no person would use, like casually in a standing split with arched back
Male characters have much much much much much much much much much much much less examples of that than female characters
https://www.tumblr.com/thehawkeyeinitiative