this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2026
74 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

85646 readers
3656 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

In theory. Nobody actually manufactures it yet in any quantity, and it will take a long time to be able to replace even a measurable fraction of the 30 billion tons the world uses annually.

[–] HiTekRedNek@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

So let's just give up because it's a tough engineering problem, right?

People need to stop letting perfect be the enemy of good.

[–] JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz 1 points 8 hours ago

An alternative way to look at it is that we should focus on the solutions that actually make sense. Carbon capture is like plastic recycling, the solution to it isn't to try to recycle harder, it's to reduce the use of plastics so we don't have anything to recycle.
Also, do you know what the majority of the captured Co2 is currently used? To extract oil.