this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2026
416 points (98.6% liked)

Memes

16206 readers
577 users here now

Post memes here.

A meme is an idea, behavior, or style that spreads by means of imitation from person to person within a culture and often carries symbolic meaning representing a particular phenomenon or theme.

An Internet meme or meme, is a cultural item that is spread via the Internet, often through social media platforms. The name is by the concept of memes proposed by Richard Dawkins in 1972. Internet memes can take various forms, such as images, videos, GIFs, and various other viral sensations.


Laittakaa meemejä tänne.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Pepperidge Farms must've met my dad a few years back.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Zephyr@sh.itjust.works 1 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (2 children)

So natural gas powerplants with sufficient exhaust scrubbers are having a substantial effect on atmospheric pollutants? I feel like we keep getting off of the main question here. Like to stoves and lighters and such. I get nothing burns perfectly clean but seems like just an engineering hurtle to me. With natural gas I'm typically more concerned about the hydro fracking aspect. There's really not a solution to groundwater contamination in fracking beyond them saying it didn't happen.

[–] impairedimperator@lemmy.zip 2 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

Yeah. Of course, the phrase "sufficient exhaust scrubbers" is about as reasonable as "100% perfect combustion" in this context. Engineering or no.

[–] Zephyr@sh.itjust.works 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

So it's physically impossible or just beyond our current level of technological ability?

[–] impairedimperator@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Well, I think we could easily start by synthesizing high purity methane. As long as you do it very slow and in small amounts, you can at least get rid of hereroatoms. After that, we could have several stages of carb/exhaust loops to ensure complete combustion. Of course, you're going to need to heat the last few stages.

Then you just spent 10x the energy you'll get from the natural gas just making it clean. Checkmate, liberals.

[–] Zephyr@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

I feel like there's a reasonable optimization. Everything has an environmental cost, even the production of green energy infrastructure. I think we can reasonably compare and contrast the probable lifetime impact of an energy source, including decommission and possible recycling. That is nothing is perfect but it's about what's the best we can manage given what the market can financially support.

[–] impairedimperator@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Yes, that is my point. It is completely unreasonable to make gas clean enough to not affect air quality. We do what we reasonably can. And that results in pollution.

[–] Zephyr@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

I'm still not fully sold that it appreciably does affect air quality, I'm aware it's not zero but is it causing like cancer and birth defects in people around the powerplant? I think you and I are more aligned than the others on this thread.

[–] impairedimperator@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 hours ago

Yes it is.

Then again everything causes cancer. Aging causes cancer.

[–] CorrectAlias@piefed.blahaj.zone 1 points 18 hours ago

Scrubbers cannot possibly capture all of it. It's not just an engineering hurdle. It's physics. Just like burning it can never be 100% efficient, scrubbing it cannot either.

Even if it were possible to somehow scrub 100% of the CO2 and other methane byproducts, it would be unbelievably expensive. Not only is it something that frankly shouldn't even be focused on any more when we already have cheap, green, renewable energy, but do you expect the capitalist billionaires to care enough to pay for the new scrubbers (which, by the way, in this context, do not even exist?)