Selfhosted

60177 readers

559 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Detailed Rules Post

Be civil.
No spam.
Posts are to be related to self-hosting.
Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or readme if you're providing a link.
Submission headline should match the article title.
No trolling.
Promotion posts require active participation, with an account that is at least 30 days old. F/LOSS without a paywall has exceptions, with requirements. See the rules link for details.

Resources:

selfh.st Newsletter and index of selfhosted software and apps
awesome-selfhosted software
awesome-sysadmin resources
Self-Hosted Podcast from Jupiter Broadcasting

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

curbstickle@anarchist.nexus

curbstickle_lw@lemmy.world

352

[META] Should AI disclosure tags [AI], [NOT AI] be mandated when sharing projects? (aussie.zone)

submitted 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) by SuspiciousCarrot78@aussie.zone to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world

163 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Based on recent comments this feels like a discussion we should have. So..topic, basically.

I'm not looking to be chief noisemaker on this, but I stand by what I wrote in !privacy and what's in my post history.

https://lemmy.ml/post/48724623/26190950

Let's have at; do we want a [AI] and [NOT AI] tag. Why or why not?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] tofu@lemmy.nocturnal.garden 3 points 3 days ago

Yes, the crowd will point it out if the author didn't and you can decide what to make of it. It's probably discouraging to post slopware if you know you're in for a lot of criticism, I'm not sure if it's better or worse than being forced to flag it [AI].