this post was submitted on 24 Jun 2026
417 points (99.8% liked)

PurchaseWithPurpose

1025 readers
2 users here now

A community driven to showing our voice through the things we buy and use.

A few useful links:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

This comes after $8.03 billion from a one-time tax benefit tied to the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which promised to "create jobs"

Stop using Big Tech's products. Support smaller businesses

As always, you can check out the community's pinned post to get started: https://lemmy.world/post/40065381

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (3 children)

And yet here we are on Lemmy. It's the same addiction just without the corporate control.

40 years ago it was BBS's and fidoNet.

[–] Zephorah@discuss.online 2 points 2 days ago

Yea, but I rationalize it in that there are real people on the other side. Not an ad-adjacent short created to serve an artificial engagement algorithm ( by AI or otherwise ) that isn’t actively engaging anyone. There’s trickery there, to make it seem so, but it’s not. It’s passive and layered.

I assume you have a life, a job. Maybe you’re drinking your coffee right now and looking out at your trees too. And we’re discussing random life shit, as people do.

People. Not an algorithm. Not AI. Or so I tell myself.

[–] doomchapel666@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 days ago

this place is turning in to reddit.

i check lemmy maybe two or three times a day in 3 or 4 minute increments just to browse the headlines. the time i spend reading or off my phone in general is several hours per day.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Social media garbage and engagement chum still leaks in here, too. People simply cannot help themselves.

But it’s made me check Lemmy less. I didn’t come here to see Blue Checkmarks on the front page.

[–] P00ptart@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The difference here is that it doesn't reward engagement. The reward is the engagement.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

But still, it’s funneling in content where the premise is gaming the system for engagement. It brings all that toxicity here, even if it doesn’t directly affect the original source on Twitter or wherever.

A great example is this, #5 on Lemmy.world’s front page for me:

https://lemmy.world/post/48552575

And it’s from a freaking Tech Bro. A straight up engagement farmer, if not bot written itself. Is the irony not obvious?