this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2026
42 points (100.0% liked)

Seattle

2079 readers
61 users here now

A community for news and discussion of Seattle, Washington and the surrounding area

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The loss of tree canopy at Sand Point was so extreme that Theo Hoss, a natural resources graduate student at Oregon State University, noticed it as part of his master's capstone project. Hoss was using the city's own light detection and ranging technology to look at changes in the tree canopy between 2016 to 2021.

He found that 94% of the 255 acres of tree canopy lost during that five-year period was from parcels that applied for development permits. Developers were basically clearing lots to build new homes, offices, apartment buildings, and condos.

But the 88-acre Sand Point parcel was an outlier. The club had applied for no development permit but accounted for 5.7 acres of the lost tree canopy.

"What we're seeing with Sand Point is a truly significant net canopy loss over that five-year period in absence of new construction to explain it," Hoss said. "It's actually the fifth highest canopy loss on any single parcel in the city that wasn't subject to redevelopment."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 6 points 20 hours ago

But dozens of last-minute amendments created loopholes for developers that made the new ordinance even weaker than the one it replaced, Claudia Newman, a partner at Bricklin & Newman, a Seattle-based firm that specializes in land use and environmental law, told KUOW.

"Under the previous code, we were losing tree canopy," Newman said. "Under the new code, things got worse."