New York Times gift articles

1674 readers

39 users here now

Share your New York Times gift articles links here.

Rules:

Only post New York Times gift article links.

Info:

The NYT Open Team. (2021-06-23). “A New Way to Share New York Times Stories”. open.nytimes.com.
“Gift Articles for New York Times Subscribers”. (n.d.). help.nytimes.com.

Tip:

Google "unlocked_article_code" and limit search results to the past week.
Mastodon: Use control-F or ⌘-F to search this page. (ref)

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

baltakatei@sopuli.xyz

Pete Buttigieg Says He Was Separated From His Children After ‘Swatting’ Tip (www.nytimes.com)

submitted 3 days ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/nyt_gift_articles@sopuli.xyz

11 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The former transportation secretary recounted being kept away from his 4-year-old twins overnight after an anonymous report falsely accused him of posing a threat to them.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Squizzy@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago (2 children)

If someone reports that kids are being abused, then the trained professionals in childcare and abuse investigations should absolutely not have to include the presumed abusers or enablers in their process.

The child is the priority and their discomfort is better than their abuse.

Imagine if CPS was called because someone said the kids were being raped and the children had to sit their alongside their rapist answering difficult upsetting questions unsure of everything other than their abuser is beside them.

[–] DougHolland@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If there's no evidence beyond an anonymous tip, this is the wrong response. Make enough anonymous tips, and every kid in America could be required to sit for an interview, over and over.

[–] Squizzy@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Then you have a completrly different set of circumstances where false reports wildly out number real cases and that would need to be accounted for but process should be followed regardless.

[–] GeeDubHayduke@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

So, did you miss the "without first requiring some damned evidence" line, or simply ignore it..?

[–] Squizzy@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

So you would seek to gather evidence from the victim, while their abuser is in the room with athority over them?

First port of call is separating and investigating.

[–] GeeDubHayduke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

So you would seek to gather evidence from the victim, while their abuser is in the room with athority over them?

Nobody has said that except you.

So, you're investigating Epstein allegations, and you think Epstein himself is in the room for every interview..?

[–] Squizzy@lemmy.world 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I didnt say that, you cant follow like three two sentence comments. Thats on you.

[–] GeeDubHayduke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Guess you didn't appreciate the implication of what YOU were suggesting.

So you would seek to gather evidence from the victim, while their abuser is in the room with athority over them?

Holy goldfish memory, Batman. I'm quoting you.

[–] Squizzy@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago

And you need to consider that in context, I wasn't saying that in every case that the abuser could be present. I was saying in the context of child abuse victims being interviewed alone, which I think is a valid process given otherwise their abuser could be in the room with them taking charge of their interview or statements.

Being able to quote something doesnt mean you csn comprehend it, or follow the thread in simple terms.