this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2026
9 points (90.9% liked)

Texas

2422 readers
464 users here now

A community for news, current events, and overall topics regarding the state of Texas

Other Texas/US Lemmy Communties to follow

Sports

BYPASSING PAYWALLS

Rules (Subject to Change)

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

CORPUS CHRISTI — Black Democrats caucusing at the Texas Democratic Party convention Friday cheered when state Rep. James Talarico, the Democratic U.S. Senate nominee, said November would bring an end to three decades of one-party statewide rule.

But some of the most emphatic applause he received during his remarks came when he acknowledged the Democratic Party’s “troubling history of taking Black voters for granted.”

“Let’s just be very honest,” Talarico said Friday to a room in Corpus Christi packed full of Black Democrats from around the state. “I am committing to you to not make those mistakes. I am committed to working with the members of this caucus to show up for, invest in and fight for the votes of every Black Texan.”

Nearly four months after defeating U.S. Rep. Jasmine Crockett of Dallas — one of the state’s most prominent Black politicians — for the U.S. Senate nomination, Talarico’s quest to coalesce Black Democrats behind his candidacy was still ongoing among the party’s rank-and-file activists at a convention where Texas Democrats were looking to present a forceful show of unity.

The unease about Talarico’s standing with Black Texans stems from a primary in which polls consistently showed the Austin Democrat with meager support — sometimes under 10% — from Black voters. The rest went to Crockett, forming the basis of her 46% vote share in the March primary. She endorsed Talarico the day after her loss and urged Democrats to “rally around” their nominees.

More recently, however, Crockett has cast doubt on whether Black voters have unified behind Talarico and the broader statewide ticket. Ahead of this week’s convention, which she skipped, Crockett also declined to commit to campaigning for Talarico, telling the Dallas Morning News she was “more focused on down-ballot races.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] reddig33@lemmy.world -3 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

You didn’t read the article in its entirety, did you?

“He did not denounce the ad”

That’s all he had to do. Instead, he let the Democratic machine do the dirty work. If you piss off minority voters in Texas by claiming the black candidate is unelectable, don’t expect them to come out and vote for you.

[–] Sharkticon@lemmy.zip 4 points 16 hours ago

Alright I'm gonna do you a solid and just ignore the blatant and in bad faith goal post moving here. Wherein you said he ran negative ads against her and now you are just not admitting that you were wrong for some mysterious reason. You did say two absolute crazy pants things I want to address.

Denounce what exactly? Specifically what did you want him to denounce? In this extremely mild ad that said she is less electable than him? You want him to denounce what? The notion that he is more electable than her? His opponent? You wanted him to publicly say that his opponent is more electable than he is? You get how that's nuts right?

More than that though I want to laugh at you heartily for the notion that the "Democratic machine" was on his side. This is how I know you don't know what the hell you are talking about. The "Democratic machine" was against the candidate that they preferred? The candidate that Kamala Harris came out to campaign for? The one that AIPAC loved so much? That candidate? The DNC loved Crockett. You think the guy calling for getting rid of corporate money in politics, who calls for taxing billionaires, who talks about working class issues was the guy getting the backing of the "Democratic machine"? What world do you live in?

[–] ruuster13@lemmy.zip 4 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Bad argument. No human could realistically denounce the swarm of shit generated by anti-democratic forces in this world. He didn't do the thing you claim.

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world -4 points 17 hours ago

These ads ran incessantly with a consistent message. All he had to do was say “that’s not cool” or “please stop” or “I don’t agree with that message”. It pissed off a lot of her supporters. To this day he hasn’t said “I don’t agree with what those ads claimed.”

The ads backfired and he didn’t do enough to distance himself from their message so he is left with the consequences from that decision. This includes Crockett currently not giving him her support. The ad will probably cost him the group of voters that would have put him over the top in the election in November.