this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2026
261 points (96.4% liked)

Europe

6646 readers
318 users here now

Europe

Rules:

  1. All sources allowed. Voting decides what is reliable unless
  2. Articles which have been proven false beyond any doubt may be removed
  3. No personal attacks
  4. Posts in English, translations allowed

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] rzadkie@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

If I was ignorant on how fascism have been again entrenching itself in western society over the last 20 years, on how and through which pipelines ideologies were spread I would at least stay silent instead of trying to pull out semantics :v

[–] spacesatan@lazysoci.al -1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

So I guess by your logic it's fair to say Islam is terroristic. Obviously distinguishing between the broader Islamic community and boko haram or al qaeda is just semantics.

*gotta wonder if the downvoters realize I was doing argumentum ad absurdum or if they think I was unironically saying that

[–] rzadkie@lemmy.world 4 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah surely broader islamic community congregated in millions on social media and forums between 2006 and 2016, mainly in western countries, mainly appealing to young disenfranchised men. To don't know the context, you either got on to the internet in 2020's or somehow, for 20 fucking years did not encounter an atheist from this batch, either irl or online. Or you're deliberately bullshitting.

[–] spacesatan@lazysoci.al 0 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

Your false dichotomy of every atheist is either a white supremacist or a communist is still completely batshit even if some fraction of new atheists fell into the far right pipeline.

Some new atheists went on to become fascist does not mean every person who followed r/atheism in 2010 is now a white supremacist or a communist, that's fucking insane.

[–] rzadkie@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

I've always read it as more of a warning. Warning as to what will happen when you leave out the fundamental issues, who's interest will be then furthered, what will be ingrained in the conscious and subconscious of the masses.

And it's not even mine, it's a paraphrase of Chico Mendes.