this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2026
717 points (95.7% liked)
Late Stage Capitalism
3419 readers
670 users here now
A place for for news, discussion, memes, and links criticizing capitalism and advancing viewpoints that challenge liberal capitalist ideology. That means any support for any liberal capitalist political party (like the Democrats) is strictly prohibited.
A zero-tolerance policy for bigotry of any kind. Failure to respect this will result in a ban.
RULES:
1 Understand the left starts at anti-capitalism.
2 No Trolling
3 No capitalist apologia, anti-socialism, or liberalism, liberalism is in direct conflict with the left. Support for capitalism or for the parties or ideologies that uphold it are not welcome or tolerated.
4 No imperialism, conservatism, reactionism or Zionism, lessor evil rhetoric. Dismissing 3rd party votes or 'wasted votes on 3rd party' is lessor evil rhetoric.
5 No bigotry, no racism, sexism, antisemitism, homophobia, transphobia, ableism, or any type of prejudice.
6 Be civil in comments and no accusations of being a bot, 'paid by Putin,' Tankie, etc. This includes instance shaming.
Introduction to Socialism (external links)
Marxism-Leninism Study Guide: Advanced Course
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Some Democrats, especially Democratic leadership, yes. But not all Democrats. There are many people within the party celebrating the democratic socialists who won
In this context, "Democrats" could be understood to mean the DNC, party leadership, and their favored corporate politicians. Obviously the people electing the democratic socialists aren't the ones opposing the democratic socialists, but we're talking about the people who have enough resources and connections to screw with us, and do, despite them saying that the party is progressive, a big tent, and that we should always support the candidates regardless of how much they align with us.
"Not all dems" is about as useful to the conversation as "not all cops" or "not all men" is to their respective discussions. Technically correct by a very literal interpretation of those words, but completely missing and/or obscuring, the point.
Those 'some democrats' need to get off the fence and abandon that party
Yes! Quit while you're winning! So smart!
You call what Democrats are doing 'winning?'
You are a shining example of those that do not understand or comprehend historical materialism. You think what is happening right now is unique time in history. This has happened time and again and those that continue to run under the party banner ended up being quashed by the party.
You truly know nothing about US politics and US political history, do you? This is a rehashing of reforms under FDR, where they offered bread crumbs so people don't demand better, so they don't demand real socialism. While they blur the lines between socialism with things like the Nordic model, which is still capitalism and its exploitation of the global south.
I'm not sure but I think they're talking about the center right leadership we have, Schumer and Jefferies cunts need to piss off and just join the GOP.
That's at least how I took it, or how I want to take it.
Nah. He's one of those types that still think the only way to get Socialists elected to office, is if they run 3rd party...despite the fact that more Socialists are beating centrist incumbents all the time.
I swear the whole concept is a psy-op intended to prevent leftists from voting, and therefore prevent them from ever holding actual power.
The problem is that the democratic party, even if it becomes overwhelmed by this new wave of social democrats, will still fall for the same trappings reformist parties run into globally. Internal opposition from those who actually control the economy, the capitalist class. The media outrage is only one small part of it, there's also the very real fact that dominating production and distribution gives you power to control the state itself. Revolution isn't just a LARP, in order to truly take political power it needs to be siezed by force, and the commanding heights of the economy expropriated by force.
Take your reform bullshit to a different space. Reform does not work, liberal voters have tried for centuries here in the US and all it's produced are 2 right wing parties that are never held accountable.
The reason there are two deeply unpopular right wing parties is because capitalists control the state and the economy, and thus pick who the working classes can pick from.
Lol! Why do you still insist that these assumptions are valid, when recent events have already proved them wrong? Or are you just going to bury the truth under more layers of conspiratorial thinking, so you don't have to acknowledge it?
The majority chooses who runs the state. Capitalists have simply convinced you that they're the ones in charge of everything, and that there's nothing you can do about it. As long as you choose to believe them, then they are right.
The DNC derives its support and power from wealthy capitalist donors, and is entrenched in the imperialist organ of the US Empire. Legislation is not "word of God," the superstructure of society does not have power over the base. You can see just how little laws actually matter when it comes to holding those fulfilling the will of capitalists accountable. Both the DNC and GOP have violated national and international law blatantly and repeatedly, but with little to no actual impact.
Without political power, which stems from the base and the state in alignment, ie a monopoly on force, there is no progress. This is why revolution is necessary, not merely reforming and replacing a capitalist party with more radical elements.
Go back to Reddit you fucking loser
No idea what you're meaning at all, nor why you think I agree with you. Reform is a dead end, revolution is necessary. This seems to run to the polar opposite of what you're saying. No idea what you mean by me saying I "say words without understanding their meaning" nor how that's applicable here.
Revolution is the overthrow of the class that controls the state and the commanding heights of the economy by another class. Labor is inherent, labor-power is commodified labor. The working classes, through revolution, sieze control of the state and the commanding heights of industry, smashing the old capitalist state and replacing it with a proletarian one.
Revolution is the conquest of state power by a given class, legitimized through a monopoly on force and the commanding heights of the economy.
If they run in the DNC they are not socialist
You sound about as smart as James Carville.
Why are they not Socialists, if they run as Democrats?
The self-avowed socialist that just won the New York City mayor position is backing Jeffries as speaker of the House. If you try to work within the confines of a poisonous system you will get poisoned
Typical liberal that refuses to see the forest for the trees. "I got mine fuck everyone else."
Securing federal funding for housing while supporting the people that created the circumstances behind unaffordable housing is moronic circular logic.
No you are not, you are a liberal thats spouted enough bullshit around here
Lol, no you aren't