this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2026
41 points (97.7% liked)

Technology

42853 readers
84 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Stopwatch1986@lemmy.ml 13 points 2 days ago (3 children)

"We recognised that for us to enhance some of our automation and machine learning and artificial intelligence tools we needed to ensure that they were trained by the most experienced individuals,"

Surely, this means Ford will spend more time getting engineers to train AI and then they will fire them again.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago

Ford has engineers that make quality vehicles? Since when?

[–] GiorgioPerlasca@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 days ago (2 children)

We will see. The point is that Large Language Models cannot produce anything that is not a copy of the work of someone else, while Ford engineers need to be creative to design new cars.

[–] Stopwatch1986@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago

We will see if they can achieve firing many engineers in the next round, but from what they openly say there that is their plan. It is unlikely they will ever get rid of all engineers, but using AI as an excuse, redundancies seems what they want. Not about the same level of expertise, but factory workers are widely used to train the LLMs that will replace them. https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2026/jun/24/indian-factory-workers-told-film-themselves-for-ai-robots

[–] ms_lane@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Probably some engineers to make a new vehicle platform-

Then instead of multiple teams turning the platform into multiple vehicles with multiple trim levels, you'll have a single team that makes one vehicle or a few different classes of vehicle on a platform then the 'AI' does the rest.

To use VW as an example-

  • One senior engineering team at VW or Porsche designs the platform (ie. MQB)

  • One or few junior engineering team(s) at VW designs vehicles (ie. VW Golf, Jetta, Tiguan)

  • A few specialty vehicles get all-human treatment (ie. 911)

  • A marketing team at Audi, Skoda, etc will design their generational design language

  • The rest is 'AI' generated from the platform, vehicle type and desired design language.

Stripping VW Group of multiple engineering teams, mostly outside Germany.

[–] eldavi@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago

... getting engineers to train AI and then they will fire them again.

it makes you wonder what those ford guys are like; knowing that this is going to happen, but they rejoin ford anyways.