this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2026
115 points (95.3% liked)
Selfhosted
60409 readers
539 users here now
A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.
Rules:
-
Be civil.
-
No spam.
-
Posts are to be related to self-hosting.
-
Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or readme if you're providing a link.
-
Submission headline should match the article title.
-
No trolling.
-
Promotion posts require active participation, with an account that is at least 30 days old. F/LOSS without a paywall has exceptions, with requirements. See the rules link for details.
Resources:
- selfh.st Newsletter and index of selfhosted software and apps
- awesome-selfhosted software
- awesome-sysadmin resources
- Self-Hosted Podcast from Jupiter Broadcasting
Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.
Questions? DM the mods!
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
They didn't shame anyone, they said they didn't understand their reasoning for doing it.
They literally led by throwing shame unto OP.
That's how they opened their response.
It is not sad. Suggesting it is sad is a "gatekeeper-ass thing" to say.
Saying something is sad isn't shaming it. It's saying it makes you sad. Which can be caused by whatever depending on the purpose. You wouldn't say someone expressing that at a funeral was shaming the deceased would you?
I think your life is sad.
Let me know how you took that.
Welcoming? Adversarial?
Well, I'd say you're right, but I don't know how you could have enough information about me to make such a determination just from this short conversation.
Right. And nor does Jason have enough info on OP.
So it comes across, as I said, as a "gatekeeper-ass" thing to say in the context of OPs journey to self hosting.
Where they are is in no way "sad". Except if you're being an adversarial gatekeeper dick about purity.