this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2026
12 points (87.5% liked)

Just Post

1528 readers
12 users here now

Just post something ๐Ÿ’›

Lemmy's general purpose discussion community with no specific topic.

Sitewide lemmy.world rules apply here.

Additionally, this is a no AI content community. We are here for human interaction, not AI slop! Posts or comments flagged as AI generated will be removed.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I'm not sure this would actually work? Is there anything wrong with it? I think it would only work somewhere that doesn't experience cold winters. The idea that it uses things that are already highly available in a very efficient synergistic combination.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] badcommandorfilename@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (2 children)

On a surface look, probably it works. Maybe things like nitrate/phosphate balance or pest/microbe control impact the long term production.

The problem, as with all CCS strategies is: how do you pay for it? Maybe you can sell those products for a rate that covers the labour and wear and upkeep of the system? It might just be more cost effective to take the carbon-free energy and use it to displace fossil fuel consumption...

[โ€“] jaykrown@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Excess energy sale, biochar, animal feed, fertilizer sales. Along with carbon capture credits if somewhere that pays for that.

[โ€“] jaykrown@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Oh I also forgot, technically you could probably raise fish in the pond as well, but I don't know if they'd eat all the azolla. The point also is to keep the pond shallow, less than 10 cm, to make it easier to construct, harvest, and manage.