this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2026
349 points (97.0% liked)

Technology

86074 readers
3094 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
349
SpaceX Is Junk. That’s What the Bond Market Says (archive.ph)
submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/technology@lemmy.world
62 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

The bond market’s assessment also jibes with SpaceX’s stock. It’s a profitless, non-dividend-paying, one-person-controlled, empire-building project trading at more than 100 times sales, about 30 times the valuation of the S&P 500 Index. That’s the very definition of a junk stock.

Original link: https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2026-07-02/spacex-is-junk-that-s-what-the-bond-market-says

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 10 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

And yet they were given the IPO, so now it's the public's problem...

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 3 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

Well the public can just not buy the shares. The whole point of the gift was to sell the shares at inflated values right at the beginning. It doesn't really matter what happens after that.

I suppose a competent government would launch an investigation into misrepresentation, as I'm pretty sure offering an IPO that's completely odd to the actual value is a crime, but obviously with a kind administration it's virtually impossible to commit a crime if you're rich enough.

[–] ShredderFeeder@shredderfood.net 2 points 5 hours ago

LOL @ "competent government". We haven't had one of those in quite a while...

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 7 points 10 hours ago

Most members of the public don't have any control over what the managers of their retirement accounts choose to invest in.

Beyond that, I'm pretty sure an IPO comes with an obligation for some index funds to invest in it.