this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2026
95 points (86.8% liked)

Technology

86105 readers
3361 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
95
Poll finds 90% in favour of social media age ban, while advocates urge action for online harms (nationalpost.com)
submitted 1 day ago by Blisterexe@lemmy.zip to c/technology@lemmy.world
26 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Polling shows that social media bans are overwhelmingly popular. This article is for canada but it holds true for the US. https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2026/07/01/majority-of-americans-support-banning-social-media-for-kids-under-16/

Just wanted to share because I've seen people act like it's some anti-democratic conspiracy that these (bad) laws are going into place.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] PonyOfWar@pawb.social 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think laws could be used to put some stronger responsibilities on the parents. Unfortunately, some of them don't care whether their children are on social media or what they do on there at all. So when something happens to a child who was too young to join social media, parents would bear some responsibility for that. Guidance is great, but not everyone will take that offer. I'm not in favor of abolishing the minimum drinking age (which is 14 here btw) either.

[โ€“] Eldritch@piefed.world 0 points 1 day ago

The parents who wouldn't be responsible. Aren't going to be responsible just because there's laws. They never have been. And realistically it's just going to punish otherwise decent ones who due to circumstances beyond their knowledge failed.

Make considerations for child neglect and endangerment charges considering such things when it's appropriate. That's workable/palatable. But the state policing basic social interaction is dystopian as fuck and screaming for abuse. No thanks. The state isn't worthy of that sort of trust in the first place. Not one of them. Leave it to the families and communities, focus on helping them to succeed. It's cheaper and more effective.