this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2026
21 points (100.0% liked)

Australia

5095 readers
30 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @Tau@aussie.zone who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @lodion@aussie.zone and @Nath@aussie.zone

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
lodion@aussie.zone
bestusername@aussie.zone
eatham@aussie.zone
Nath@aussie.zone
21
'My dating life is essentially non-existent': Why young people are staying single for longer (www.sbs.com.au)
submitted 4 weeks ago by okwithmydecay@leminal.space to c/australia@aussie.zone
15 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Zarobi@aussie.zone 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I always believed that the next thing we would optimise away is reproduction.

My prediction is, in 50 years (or sooner, depending on economics), having a baby naturally will be considered irresponsible, dangerous, and financially ruinous. Maybe even illegal. Instead, we'll have lab grown people, no messy birthing process, streamlined directly into an optimised education system. No parents, just a series of boarding schools until adulthood. Maybe even they'll experiment with the best genes for different jobs / castes, go full eugenics, but not for a while. Similar to how bees do it.

If people complain that it's unethical, they can just point at 0.6 reproduction rates and say it's necessary, ignoring all the fixable but inconvenient quality of life issues that are keeping that number low. It'll be presented as a good thing, "solving" human extinction. Of course, there will be pros and cons to this.