this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2026
69 points (94.8% liked)

Technology

86187 readers
3011 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ArcaneGadget@nord.pub 45 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (2 children)

"What is the most resource inefficient way we can come up with, to get supplies to the frontline." I hate theese tech-bros so much...

[–] abbadon420@sh.itjust.works 7 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

It's not the worst idea. The road between your basecamp and the frontline can easily be blocked by enemies, but the line between a satelite and your frontline is not easily blocked. For simplicity I'm assuming our hypthetical enemy doesn't have an abundance of relatively cheap ground to air missiles, like every military in the world has.

[–] RIotingPacifist@lemmy.world 6 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Why would you want this over just airdropping supplies?

Also I'm no military need, but if the road between your basecamp and the frontline can easily be blocked then I don't think you actually hold that territory and may have over extended yourself and no matter how many supplies you drop/"Enemy" "combatants"/civilians you kill, you're likely losing the war (see Rhodesia (LOL) or Vietnam)

[–] GreyEyedGhost@piefed.ca 1 points 1 hour ago

Well, a suborbital flight is less than an hour to anywhere. That absolutely has its advantages if cost and efficiency aren't factors, but the payload would still have to be prepared and loaded. At that point, it just sounds like a way to compensate for bad logistics. It could be legitimately useful for emergency/surprise operations, but those also aren't something you want to build your overall strategy around.

[–] HieroProtagonist@lemmy.ml 9 points 15 hours ago