2300
submitted 1 year ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

Tech's broken promises: Streaming is now just as expensive and confusing as cable. Ubers cost as much as taxis. And the cloud is no longer cheap::Some tech is getting pricier and looking a lot like the older services it was supposed to beat. From video streaming to ride-hailing and cloud computing.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] agitatedpotato@lemmy.dbzer0.com 40 points 1 year ago

It's your fault for believing the promises of a salesman. Tech bros are just industrial middlemen who pedel new technological solutions for problems that may or may not benefit from it, but that doesn't matter to them, they're just here to sell the tech. Thats how they get paid.

[-] Copernican@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

There was never a world in which TV companies like Disney and NBC could lose cable subscribers (yes comcast manages the subs, but they pay Disney and NBC carriage fees from subscription fees) and make streaming cheaper than cable. So if you are losing a lot of money via cord cutting, and then you have the expense of standing up your own streaming service... Yeah, it's going to probably cost the same as fees the cable company used to kick back to Disney. The difference is that if you want all the content from everyone, you need to then to get all the app subscriptions. However, you no longer get the bundled price that provided some discount via cable.

I don't know that there was ever a promise that streaming would be cheaper. It could be more a la carte, but the cost for the content was never going to change in the eyes of the tv companies that now have the added operation cost of maintaining an app.

[-] TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee -2 points 1 year ago

it's MY fault that there are fewer cabs because other mother fuckers stopped using them?

[-] agitatedpotato@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago

Yep, my entire post was about was about TimewornTraveler and no one else. Its definitely all your fault. Pay no attention to the fact that I said 'for believing tech bros' which would exclude anyone who didn't believe tech bros from the statement, Instead just get upset about nothing.

[-] focusedkiwibear@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

maybe don't make such a general blanket statement that anyone could take offense from, next time maybe? maybe don't blame anyone for corporate greed except the corporates who are greeding instead of getting upset about nothing

[-] agitatedpotato@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago

The 'general statement' had a very specific qualifier that the op ignored in order to make himself upset. It had nothing to do with generality and everything to do with ignoring half a sentence so someone could make themselves mad.

[-] TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee -2 points 1 year ago

You can see the absurdity of my statement but not of yours.... odd

[-] agitatedpotato@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago

You literally ignored half of the sentence you have a problem with so you could be contrarian. Odd.

[-] TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I dont know why I'm still responding to this tedious, disingenuous bullshit but here goes.... You made a statement: "It's 'your' [sic] fault." Then you gave a supporting statement: "Tech bros only want money." Cool. I agree with the latter part. But you are using it to support a conclusion that I don't agree with. Hence I attacked the fucking conclusion instead of the supporting details.

Do you understand now? Or did you always understand but you can't take accountability for making a shitty statement and instead you harp on meaningless bullshit?

Instead of blaming the people who use these services - and make blanket statements as if we are all using those services - how about you either A) stick to criticizing the bad actors or B) shut the fuck up.

Okay? Thanks. Talk to you later.

[-] agitatedpotato@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

And yet you still omit the very same words you omitted from the beginning. I get it though, you have no arguement if you acknowledge it was in the very same sentence qualifying my statement you wanna be mad at, keep digging friend. How many times are you gonna ignore it? Also how are you gonna use quotes if you don't copy the actual sentence and just put your own period in it before my real sentence ended? You as good at citing things as you are at logic.

this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2023
2300 points (97.7% liked)

Technology

59889 readers
2493 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS