this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2026
520 points (98.9% liked)

THE POLICE PROBLEM

5167 readers
583 users here now

    The police problem is that police are policed by the police. Cops are accountable only to other cops, which is no accountability at all.

    99.9999% of police brutality, corruption, and misconduct is never investigated, never punished, never makes the news, so it's not on this page.

    When cops are caught breaking the law, they're investigated by other cops. Details are kept quiet, the officers' names are withheld from public knowledge, and what info is eventually released is only what police choose to release — often nothing at all.

    When police are fired — which is all too rare — they leave with 'law enforcement experience' and can easily find work in another police department nearby. It's called "Wandering Cops."

    When police testify under oath, they lie so frequently that cops themselves have a joking term for it: "testilying." Yet it's almost unheard of for police to be punished or prosecuted for perjury.

    Cops can and do get away with lawlessness, because cops protect other cops. If they don't, they aren't cops for long.

    The legal doctrine of "qualified immunity" renders police officers invulnerable to lawsuits for almost anything they do. In practice, getting past 'qualified immunity' is so unlikely, it makes headlines when it happens.

    All this is a path to a police state.

    In a free society, police must always be under serious and skeptical public oversight, with non-cops and non-cronies in charge, issuing genuine punishment when warranted.

    Police who break the law must be prosecuted like anyone else, promptly fired if guilty, and barred from ever working in law-enforcement again.

    That's the solution.

♦ ♦ ♦

Our definition of ‘cops’ is broad, and includes prison guards, probation officers, shitty DAs and judges, etc — anyone who has the authority to fuck over people’s lives, with minimal or no oversight.

♦ ♦ ♦

RULES

Real-life decorum is expected. Please don't say things only a child or a jackass would say in person.

If you're here to support the police, you're trolling. Please exercise your right to remain silent.

Saying ~~cops~~ ANYONE should be killed lowers the IQ in any conversation. They're about killing people; we're not.

Please don't dox or post calls for harassment, vigilantism, tar & feather attacks, etc.

Please also abide by the instance rules.

It you've been banned but don't know why, check the moderator's log. If you feel you didn't deserve it, hey, I'm new at this and maybe you're right. Send a cordial PM, for a second chance.

♦ ♦ ♦

ALLIES

!abolition@slrpnk.net

!acab@lemmygrad.ml

r/ACAB

r/BadCopNoDonut/

Randy Balko

The Civil Rights Lawyer

The Honest Courtesan

Identity Project

MirandaWarning.org

♦ ♦ ♦

INFO

A demonstrator's guide to understanding riot munitions

Adultification

Cops aren't supposed to be smart

Don't talk to the police.

Killings by law enforcement in Canada

Killings by law enforcement in the United Kingdom

Killings by law enforcement in the United States

Know your rights: Filming the police

Three words. 70 cases. The tragic history of 'I can’t breathe' (as of 2020)

Police aren't primarily about helping you or solving crimes.

Police lie under oath, a lot

Police spin: An object lesson in Copspeak

Police unions and arbitrators keep abusive cops on the street

Shielded from Justice: Police Brutality and Accountability in the United States

So you wanna be a cop?

When the police knock on your door

♦ ♦ ♦

ORGANIZATIONS

Black Lives Matter

Campaign Zero

Innocence Project

The Marshall Project

Movement Law Lab

NAACP

National Police Accountability Project

Say Their Names

Vera: Ending Mass Incarceration

 

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] homes@piefed.world 7 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

It is for this exact reason that there’s no one single button to launch a nuclear weapon. It’s an incredibly long and complicated chain of command from the order being given to the weapon actually being launched. it goes through a list of people trained rigorously in extensively, strict protocols, who can, under their own judgment (although, not necessarily under their own authority), stop the order at any point along the way.

[–] areakode@riskeratspizza.com 17 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

The question is, how many of those people have now been replace with yes-men? Scary thought.

[–] homes@piefed.world 3 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

that's a good question, for sure, but I have reasonable confidence in our military commanders and the military chain of command, who/which play a big part. they have a severe intolerance for the type of bullshit that the Trump admin seems to run on, and are exactly the types who would resist in such a crisis. Yeah, we've seen some high-profile departures in top positions, but I think it's more important how many we haven't seen.

of course, we' be unaware of any shuffling-around, so there's that to wonder about, if you'd like to lose some sleep... ;)

[–] MnemonicBump@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I have reasonable confidence in our military commanders

I don't. Aside from all of the other questionable things that they have done over the decades, they lost at least six nuclear weapons that we know of. Let that sink in.

[–] homes@piefed.world 2 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

they didn't lose them by launching them at someplace... for all of their flaws, which abound, I agree, I'm reasonably certain that those in the chain of command responsible for shooting them off wouldn't do so for some bananas, insane reason if ordered to do so. some of them may be stupid, but I don't think that they're crazy.